Car comparison

AUDI Q2L · Facelift 2021 35 TFSIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q2L · Facelift 2021

35 TFSI

160 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,293 kg
    2,851 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    160 hp
    119 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.6 mpg US
    45.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    800 km
    497 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSIFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
160hp119kW
155hp116kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,425kg3,142lb
1,293kg2,851lb
Gross weight
1,875kg4,134lb
1,835kg4,045lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.2s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
54.7s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.7s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.6mpg US45.2mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.7s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
800km497mi
Calculated
667km414mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,498cc91cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,270mm168in
4,186mm165in
Width
1,785mm70in
-
Height
1,547mm61in
1,550mm61in
Wheelbase
2,628mm103in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,567mm62in
Rear track
1,545mm61in
1,526mm60in
Ground clearance
142mm6in
163mm6in
Trunk volume
347L
456L
Max trunk volume-
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSIFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI5,500 rpm1,750-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSIFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.7 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.2 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
54.7 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
14.1 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.7 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
160 hp
119 kW
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI has 5 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1,293 kg
2,851 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI9.2 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost8.7 s

Although AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
6.3 L/100 km
37.6 mpg US
45.2 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
800 km
497 mi
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
667 km
414 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
160 hp
119 kW
9.2 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
Power
160 hp
119 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Length
4,270 mm
168.1 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
Power
160 hp
119 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.6 mpg US
45.2 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
6.3 L/100 km
37.6 mpg US
45.2 mpg UK
9.2 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.6 mpg US
45.2 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSIFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
160 hp
119 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.2 s
8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.6 mpg US
45.2 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Length
4,270 mm
168.1 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Range score
800 km
497 mi
667 km
414 mi
Trunk score
347 L
12.3 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSIFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.6 mpg US45.2 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.94 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.60 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used938 L248 US gal206 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,641 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 133 km (83 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 132 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 109 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSIvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
35 TFSI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSIvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSIvsAUDIQ235 TDI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
35 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
35 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 TCe
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsRenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe
AUDI Q2L · Facelift 2021 35 TFSI vs Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster