Car comparison

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDIvsInfiniti FX II 50 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI nanuk quattro concept

5.0 V10 TDI

544 hpDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCrossover2013-2013
VS

Infiniti FX II

50 V8

390 hp5026 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCrossover2008-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    305 km/h
    190 mph
  • Most powerful
    544 hp
    406 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,000 Nm
    738 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,900 kg
    4,189 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    286 hp/t
    214 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIInfinitiFX II50 V8
Power
544hp406kW
390hp291kW
Torque
1,000Nm738lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,900kg4,189lb
2,075kg4,575lb
Gross weight-
2,615kg5,765lb
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
55.2s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
93.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
Calculated
22.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.6s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
286hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
526Nm/t352lb-ft/ton
Calculated
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
687km427mi
Calculated
Displacement-
5,026cc307cu in
Length
4,541mm179in
4,860mm191in
Width
1,990mm78in
1,925mm76in
Height
1,337mm53in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,710mm107in
2,885mm114in
Front track-
1,635mm64in
Rear track-
1,640mm65in
Ground clearance-
187mm7in
Trunk volume-
702L
Max trunk volume-
1,756L
Doors
2
5
Seats
2
5
Fuel tank-
90L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDIInfiniti FX II 50 V8PowerTorque
  • AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Infiniti FX II 50 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI-1,500 rpm1,750 rpm
InfinitiFX II50 V86,500 rpm4,400 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIInfinitiFX II50 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
22.7 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
11.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.6 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
204 km/h
127 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
544 hp
406 kW
InfinitiFX II50 V8
390 hp
291 kW

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI has 154 hp more than Infiniti FX II 50 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Infiniti FX II 50 V8 and AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI: 154 hp (115 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
InfinitiFX II50 V8
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
InfinitiFX II50 V8
2,075 kg
4,575 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
305 km/h
190 mph
InfinitiFX II50 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI3.8 s
InfinitiFX II50 V85.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI and Infiniti FX II 50 V8: 2.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
InfinitiFX II50 V8
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI and Infiniti FX II 50 V8: 5.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
286 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
InfinitiFX II50 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
544 hp
406 kW
3.8 s
305 km/h
190 mph
InfinitiFX II50 V8
390 hp
291 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,541 mm
178.8 in
Height
1,337 mm
52.6 in
InfinitiFX II50 V8
Power
390 hp
291 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
702 L
24.8 cu ft
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
InfinitiFX II50 V8
Power
390 hp
291 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
3.8 s
InfinitiFX II50 V8
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
286 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
InfinitiFX II50 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIInfinitiFX II50 V8
Power
544 hp
406 kW
390 hp
291 kW
Torque
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
5.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
2,075 kg
4,575 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,541 mm
178.8 in
Height
1,337 mm
52.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
702 L
24.8 cu ft
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
-
687 km
427 mi
Trunk score
-
702 L
24.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
286 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDIInfiniti FX II 50 V8
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km22.93 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi36.89 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year3,439 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI

  • Has 154 hp more
  • Has 500 Nm more
  • Is 175 kg lighter
  • Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 5.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 98 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Infiniti FX II 50 V8

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI
Infiniti FX II 50 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

5.0 V10 TDI
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
50 V8
2.5 T5
VS
InfinitiFX II50 V8vsVolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5
5.0 V10 TDI
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
50 V8
2.0 T5
VS
InfinitiFX II50 V8vsVolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T5
5.0 V10 TDI
4.0 TFSI V8
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
50 V8
1.8 Energy TCe
VS
InfinitiFX II50 V8vsRenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe
50 V8
ML 500 V8
VS
InfinitiFX II50 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W164)Facelift 2008ML 500 V8
5.0 V10 TDI
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10
50 V8
S 500 V8
VS
InfinitiFX II50 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 V8
5.0 V10 TDI
4.0 TFSI V8
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8
50 V8
5.0 V8
VS
InfinitiFX II50 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
5.0 V10 TDI
GT 5.2 V10
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI vs Infiniti FX II 50 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster