Car comparison

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI nanuk quattro concept

5.0 V10 TDI

544 hpDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCrossover2013-2013
VS

AUDI RS6 Avant (C7)

4.0 TFSI V8

560 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboWagon / estate2013-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    305 km/h
    190 mph
  • Highest torque
    1,000 Nm
    738 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,900 kg
    4,189 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIAUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
Power
544hp406kW
560hp418kW
Torque
1,000Nm738lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,900kg4,189lb
1,935kg4,266lb
Gross weight-
2,565kg5,655lb
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
55.2s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
37.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
Calculated
11.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.6s
Calculated
11.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
286hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
289hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
526Nm/t352lb-ft/ton
Calculated
362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
663km412mi
Calculated
Displacement-
3,993cc244cu in
Length
4,541mm179in
4,979mm196in
Width
1,990mm78in
1,936mm76in
Height
1,337mm53in
1,461mm58in
Wheelbase
2,710mm107in
2,915mm115in
Front track-
1,662mm65in
Rear track-
1,663mm65in
Trunk volume-
565L
Max trunk volume-
1,680L
Doors
2
5
Seats
2
5
Fuel tank-
65L
CO2 emissions-
229g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDIAUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8PowerTorque
  • AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI: Power / Torque
  • AUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI-1,500 rpm1,750 rpm
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V85,700-6,600 rpm1,750-5,500 rpm6,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIAUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
11.9 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
9.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.6 s
11.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
204 km/h
127 mph
199 km/h
124 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
544 hp
406 kW
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
560 hp
418 kW

AUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8 has 16 hp more than AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI and AUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
1,935 kg
4,266 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
305 km/h
190 mph
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI3.8 s
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V83.9 s

Although AUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8 has more power, AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI and AUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI and AUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
286 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
289 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
544 hp
406 kW
3.8 s
305 km/h
190 mph
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
560 hp
418 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,541 mm
178.8 in
Height
1,337 mm
52.6 in
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,979 mm
196.0 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
3.8 s
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
286 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
289 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIAUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
Power
544 hp
406 kW
560 hp
418 kW
Torque
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
3.9 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
1,935 kg
4,266 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,541 mm
178.8 in
Height
1,337 mm
52.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,979 mm
196.0 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Range score
-
663 km
412 mi
CO2 score
-
229 g/km
Trunk score
-
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
286 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
289 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDIAUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI

  • Has 300 Nm more
  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power

AUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI
AUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

5.0 V10 TDI
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
4.0 TFSI V8
4.0 TFSI V8
VS
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8vsAUDIRS6 Avant (C7)Facelift 20144.0 TFSI V8
5.0 V10 TDI
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
4.0 TFSI V8
4.0 TFSI V8
VS
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8vsAUDIRS6 Avant (C8)4.0 TFSI V8
5.0 V10 TDI
2.5 T5
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsVolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5
4.0 TFSI V8
4.2 BiTurbo V8
VS
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8vsAUDIRS 6 (4B/C5)4.2 BiTurbo V8
5.0 V10 TDI
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10
4.0 TFSI V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8vsAUDIRS4 Avant (B8)Facelift 20114.2 FSI V8
5.0 V10 TDI
4.0 TFSI V8
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8
4.0 TFSI V8
AMG CLS 63 V8
VS
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8vsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)AMG CLS 63 V8
5.0 V10 TDI
GT 5.2 V10
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10
4.0 TFSI V8
4.0 TFSI V8
VS
AUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8vsAUDIS6 Avant (C7)Facelift 20144.0 TFSI V8
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI vs AUDI RS6 Avant (C7) 4.0 TFSI V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster