AUDI nanuk quattro concept
Car comparison
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDIvsVolvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful544 hp406 kW
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score86/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5
- Lightest1,569 kg3,459 lb
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 544hp406kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 1,000Nm738lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,569kg3,459lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.2s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 75.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 25.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 526Nm/t352lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 731km454mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 2,497cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,541mm179in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,990mm78in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,337mm53in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,710mm107in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 182g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | - | 1,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 5,400 rpm | 1,800-4,200 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 25.0 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 544 hp 406 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI has 290 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5 and AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI: 290 hp (216 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 3.8 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5: 2.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 286 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 544 hp 406 kW | 3.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 6.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 286 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 544 hp 406 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 731 km 454 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 182 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI
- Has 290 hp more
- Has 640 Nm more
- Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 65 km/h (40 mph) higher top speed
- Has 124 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5
- Is 331 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























