Car comparison

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) · Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10vsAUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) · Facelift 2012

5.2 FSI V10

525 hp5204 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2012-2015
VS

AUDI nanuk quattro concept

5.0 V10 TDI

544 hpDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCrossover2013-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI

  • Most powerful
    544 hp
    406 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,000 Nm
    738 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    55/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
Power
525hp391kW
544hp406kW
Torque
530Nm391lb-ft
1,000Nm738lb-ft
Curb weight
1,745kg3,847lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Gross weight
2,045kg4,508lb
-
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
To 99% top speed
61.0s99% target: 308 km/h / 191 mph
Calculated
55.2s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
3.8s
0-200 km/h
11.4s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
20.5L/100 km11.5mpg US13.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.6s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
301hp/t224kW/t136hp/1000 lb
Calculated
286hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
526Nm/t352lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
602km374mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
5,204cc318cu in
-
Length
4,440mm175in
4,541mm179in
Width
1,929mm76in
1,990mm78in
Height
1,244mm49in
1,337mm53in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,710mm107in
Front track
1,638mm64in
-
Rear track
1,595mm63in
-
Trunk volume
100L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
80L
-
CO2 emissions
310g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDIPowerTorque
  • AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
  • AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V108,000 rpm6,500 rpm8,250 rpm
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI-1,500 rpm1,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
3.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.4 s
11.2 s
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.6 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
202 km/h
126 mph
204 km/h
127 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
525 hp
391 kW
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
544 hp
406 kW

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI has 19 hp more than AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 and AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
530 Nm
391 lb-ft
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
1,900 kg
4,189 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
311 km/h
193 mph
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
305 km/h
190 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V103.8 s
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI3.8 s

Although AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI has more power, AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: 5.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
301 hp/t
224 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
286 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
525 hp
391 kW
3.8 s
311 km/h
193 mph
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
544 hp
406 kW
3.8 s
305 km/h
190 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,440 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,244 mm
49.0 in
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,541 mm
178.8 in
Height
1,337 mm
52.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
3.8 s
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
3.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
301 hp/t
224 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
286 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI
Power
525 hp
391 kW
544 hp
406 kW
Torque
530 Nm
391 lb-ft
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
3.8 s
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Lightness
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
Fuel consumption
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,440 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,244 mm
49.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,541 mm
178.8 in
Height
1,337 mm
52.6 in
Range score
602 km
374 mi
-
CO2 score
310 g/km
-
Trunk score
100 L
3.5 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
301 hp/t
224 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
286 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI
Consumption13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.28 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.46 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,491 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10

  • Is 155 kg lighter
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) 5.2 FSI V10
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
5.0 V10 TDI
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10
5.0 V10 TDI
4.0 TFSI V8
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIRS6 Avant (C7)4.0 TFSI V8
5.2 FSI V10
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)Facelift 20124.2 FSI V8
5.0 V10 TDI
2.5 T5
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsVolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5
5.2 FSI V10
6.0 V12
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12
5.2 FSI V10
30 4.3 V8
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsFerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8
5.0 V10 TDI
4.0 TFSI V8
VS
AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDIvsAUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8
5.2 FSI V10
3.8 V6
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) · Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 vs AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster