Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6vsAUDI R8 Spyder (42) · Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI R8 Spyder (42) · Facelift 2012
5.2 FSI V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque632 Nm466 lb-ft
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Best power-to-weight316 hp/t236 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range627 km390 mi
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 632Nm466lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,045kg4,508lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 40.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 61.0s99% target: 308 km/h / 191 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.9s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 20.5L/100 km11.5mpg US13.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.2s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 316hp/t236kW/t143hp/1000 lb Calculated | 301hp/t224kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 627km390mi Calculated | 602km374mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 5,204cc318cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,440mm175in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,929mm76in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,244mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,638mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,595mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 105mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 100L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 310g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 3,200-5,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.9 s | 11.4 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.2 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 228 km/h 141 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 525 hp 391 kW |
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 has 25 hp more than AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 632 Nm 466 lb-ft |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 311 km/h 193 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 316 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 627 km 390 mi |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 602 km 374 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 550 hp 410 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 525 hp 391 kW | 3.8 s | 311 km/h 193 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 |
| 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 316 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 632 Nm 466 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 627 km 390 mi | 602 km 374 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 310 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 316 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 | AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 23.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 37.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 3,491 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 102 Nm more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Has 215 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























