Car comparison

Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche 911 (991)

Turbo S 3.8

560 hp3800 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2013-2016
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6

550 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2012-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8

  • Fastest top speed
    318 km/h
    198 mph
  • Most powerful
    560 hp
    418 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,605 kg
    3,538 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    349 hp/t
    260 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.2 L/100 km
    17.8 mpg US
    21.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    701 km
    436 mi
  • Largest trunk
    375 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best economy score
    81/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
560hp418kW
550hp410kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
632Nm466lb-ft
Curb weight
1,605kg3,538lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Gross weight
1,990kg4,387lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
44.5s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph
Calculated
40.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.1s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
8.7s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.0s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.6s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
349hp/t260kW/t158hp/1000 lb
Calculated
316hp/t236kW/t143hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
436Nm/t292lb-ft/ton
Calculated
363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
701km436mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,800cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,506mm177in
4,670mm184in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,296mm51in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,450mm96in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,539mm61in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,590mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
375L
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
68L
74L
CO2 emissions
227g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.86,500-6,750 rpm2,100-4,250 rpm7,000 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V66,400 rpm3,200-5,800 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.0 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.1 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
8.7 s
7.9 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.7 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.0 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.0 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.6 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
222 km/h
138 mph
228 km/h
141 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
560 hp
418 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
550 hp
410 kW

Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 has 10 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
632 Nm
466 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
1,740 kg
3,836 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
318 km/h
198 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.83.1 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V62.8 s

Although Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
349 hp/t
260 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
701 km
436 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
627 km
390 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
560 hp
418 kW
3.1 s
318 km/h
198 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
550 hp
410 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
375 L
13.2 cu ft
Length
4,506 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,296 mm
51.0 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
3.1 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
349 hp/t
260 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
560 hp
418 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
632 Nm
466 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.1 s
2.8 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Fuel consumption
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
375 L
13.2 cu ft
Length
4,506 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,296 mm
51.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
701 km
436 mi
627 km
390 mi
CO2 score
227 g/km
-
Trunk score
375 L
13.2 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
349 hp/t
260 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
Consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.97 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.32 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,546 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 68 Nm more
  • Is 135 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 60 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Turbo S 3.8
Turbo 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8
3.8 V6
Track Edition 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
Turbo 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10 plus
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
Turbo S 3.8
GT2 3.6
VS
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 (997)GT2 3.6
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
Turbo S 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8
3.8 V6
R 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
Turbo S 3.8
GT3 4.0
VS
Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 (992)Facelift 2024GT3 4.0
3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsFerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster