Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35)

3.8 V6

485 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2007-2010
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6

550 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2012-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Most powerful
    550 hp
    410 kW
  • Highest torque
    632 Nm
    466 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    316 hp/t
    236 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    627 km
    390 mi
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100

Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 485 hp

  • Fastest top speed
    320 km/h
    199 mph Unrestricted
    310 km/h
    193 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,740 kg
    3,836 lb
  • Largest trunk
    315 L
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
Power
485hp362kW
550hp410kW
Torque
588Nm434lb-ft
632Nm466lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Calculated
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
55.0s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph
Calculated
40.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.5s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
10.1s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.2s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb
Calculated
316hp/t236kW/t143hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton
Calculated
363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
597km371mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,650mm183in
4,670mm184in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
105mm4in
105mm4in
Trunk volume
315L
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
74L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 485 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hpPowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 485 hp: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp6,400 rpm3,200-5,200 rpm6,650 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp6,400 rpm3,200-5,800 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.5 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.1 s
7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Likely limited
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.4 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.5 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.2 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
211 km/h
131 mph
228 km/h
141 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
485 hp
362 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
550 hp
410 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp has 65 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 485 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 485 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp: 65 hp (48 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
588 Nm
434 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
632 Nm
466 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
1,740 kg
3,836 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp3.5 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp2.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 485 hp: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 485 hp: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
597 km
371 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
627 km
390 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
485 hp
362 kW
3.5 s
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
550 hp
410 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
Power
485 hp
362 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
Power
485 hp
362 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
3.5 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hp
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6485 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
Power
485 hp
362 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
588 Nm
434 lb-ft
632 Nm
466 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.5 s
2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
597 km
371 mi
627 km
390 mi
Trunk score
315 L
11.1 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 485 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 485 hp

  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp

  • Has 65 hp more
  • Has 44 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 30 km (19 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
3.8 V6
Track Edition 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10 plus
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
3.8 V6
Turbo 3.6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (997)Turbo 3.6
3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
3.8 V6
AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8
3.8 V6
R 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
3.8 V6
Z06 7.0 i V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8
3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsFerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
3.8 V6
6.0 i V12 48V
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsAston MartinDB9 Coupe6.0 i V12 48V
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster