Porsche 911 (997)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6vsPorsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (991)
Turbo S 3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.1 s
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions227 g/km
- Largest trunk375 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6
- Fastest top speed329 km/h204 mph
- Lightest1,440 kg3,175 lb
- Best power-to-weight368 hp/t274 kW/t2.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range720 km447 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,440kg3,175lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 329 km/h 204 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.4s99% target: 326 km/h / 202 mph Calculated | 44.5s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.0s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.8L/100 km12.5mpg US15.0mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 368hp/t274kW/t167hp/1000 lb Calculated | 349hp/t260kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 472Nm/t316lb-ft/ton Calculated | 436Nm/t292lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 720km447mi Calculated | 701km436mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,600cc220cu in | 3,800cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,469mm176in | 4,506mm177in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,296mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,350mm93in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | - | 1,539mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,590mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 105L | 375L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 298g/km | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,200-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 6,500-6,750 rpm | 2,100-4,250 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.0 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 44.0 s | - |
| Top speed | 329 km/h 204 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 10.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 214 km/h 133 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 530 hp 395 kW |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 has 30 hp more than Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6 and Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 329 km/h 204 mph |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 3.7 s |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 3.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 368 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 720 km 447 mi |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 701 km 436 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 530 hp 395 kW | 3.7 s | 329 km/h 204 mph |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.1 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 3.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 368 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 329 km/h 204 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 720 km 447 mi | 701 km 436 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 298 g/km | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | 375 L 13.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 368 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6 | Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 270 L more trunk volume
- Emits 71 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























