AUDI R8 Coupe (42)
Car comparison
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10vsAUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI nanuk quattro concept
5.0 V10 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score55/100
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Lightest1,525 kg3,362 lb
- Best power-to-weight367 hp/t274 kW/t2.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 544hp406kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Gross weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | - |
| Top speed | 320 km/h 199 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.6s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 55.2s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.1s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21L/100 km11.2mpg US13.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 367hp/t274kW/t167hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 354Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 526Nm/t352lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,204cc318cu in | - |
| Length | 4,434mm175in | 4,541mm179in |
| Width | 1,930mm76in | 1,990mm78in |
| Height | 1,252mm49in | 1,337mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 100L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 190L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 323g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10: Power / Torque
- AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,700 rpm |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | - | 1,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.1 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | 320 km/h 199 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 212 km/h 131 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 560 hp 418 kW |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 544 hp 406 kW |
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10 has 16 hp more than AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI and AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 320 km/h 199 mph |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 305 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 3.6 s |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10 and AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI and AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10: 6.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 367 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 286 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.6 s | 320 km/h 199 mph |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 544 hp 406 kW | 3.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | 367 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | 286 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10 | AUDInanuk quattro concept5.0 V10 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 544 hp 406 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 320 km/h 199 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 323 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 367 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10 | AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) GT 5.2 V10
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 375 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 81 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI nanuk quattro concept 5.0 V10 TDI
- Has 460 Nm more
- Uses 6.1 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























