Infiniti FX II
Car comparison
Infiniti FX II 50 V8vsVolvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti FX II 50 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight188 hp/t140 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk702 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5
- Lightest1,569 kg3,459 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range731 km454 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiFX II50 V8 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 1,569kg3,459lb |
| Gross weight | 2,615kg5,765lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 75.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.6s Calculated | 24.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 687km427mi Calculated | 731km454mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,026cc307cu in | 2,497cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,860mm191in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,925mm76in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,680mm66in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,885mm114in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,640mm65in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 187mm7in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 702L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,756L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 182g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti FX II 50 V8: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 5,400 rpm | 1,800-4,200 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiFX II50 V8 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.6 s | 24.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 390 hp 291 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
Infiniti FX II 50 V8 has 136 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5 and Infiniti FX II 50 V8: 136 hp (101 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 2,075 kg 4,575 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 5.8 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti FX II 50 V8 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5 and Infiniti FX II 50 V8: 5.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 687 km 427 mi |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 731 km 454 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 390 hp 291 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 6.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti FX II 50 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiFX II50 V8 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,075 kg 4,575 lb | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 687 km 427 mi | 731 km 454 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 182 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 702 L 24.8 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti FX II 50 V8 | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti FX II 50 V8
- Has 136 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 367 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5
- Is 506 kg lighter
- Uses 5.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 44 km (27 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























