Infiniti FX II
Car comparison
Infiniti FX II 50 V8vsRenault Espace V 1.8 Energy TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Espace V
1.8 Energy TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti FX II 50 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight188 hp/t140 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk702 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Renault Espace V 1.8 Energy TCe
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range853 km530 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiFX II50 V8 | RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,615kg5,765lb | 2,393kg5,276lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 95.7s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.6s Calculated | 39.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 687km427mi Calculated | 853km530mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,026cc307cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,860mm191in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,925mm76in | 1,888mm74in |
| Height | 1,680mm66in | 1,677mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,885mm114in | 2,884mm114in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,640mm65in | 1,621mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 187mm7in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 702L | 680L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,756L | 2,101L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 152g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti FX II 50 V8: Power / Torque
- Renault Espace V 1.8 Energy TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 5,600 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiFX II50 V8 | RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.6 s | 39.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 390 hp 291 kW |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 225 hp 168 kW |
Infiniti FX II 50 V8 has 165 hp more than Renault Espace V 1.8 Energy TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Espace V 1.8 Energy TCe and Infiniti FX II 50 V8: 165 hp (123 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 2,075 kg 4,575 lb |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 5.8 s |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti FX II 50 V8 and Renault Espace V 1.8 Energy TCe: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Espace V 1.8 Energy TCe and Infiniti FX II 50 V8: 6.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 687 km 427 mi |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 853 km 530 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 390 hp 291 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti FX II 50 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiFX II50 V8 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiFX II50 V8 | RenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,075 kg 4,575 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 687 km 427 mi | 853 km 530 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 152 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 702 L 24.8 cu ft | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti FX II 50 V8 | Renault Espace V 1.8 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti FX II 50 V8
- Has 165 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 36 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 22 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Espace V 1.8 Energy TCe
- Is 465 kg lighter
- Uses 6.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 166 km (103 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























