Car comparison

Alpine A110 S 1.8vsChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpine A110

S 1.8

292 hp1800 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2019-2021
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018

2.0 T

275 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpine A110 S 1.8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    292 hp
    218 kW
  • Lightest
    1,114 kg
    2,456 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    262 hp/t
    195 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    69/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpineA110S 1.8ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
292hp218kW
275hp205kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,114kg2,456lb
1,512kg3,333lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
81.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
14.3s
Calculated
23.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb
Calculated
182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
738km458mi
Calculated
766km476mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,800cc110cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,180mm165in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,798mm71in
1,897mm75in
Height
1,248mm49in
1,348mm53in
Wheelbase
2,419mm95in
2,811mm111in
Front track
1,556mm61in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,553mm61in
1,618mm64in
Trunk volume-
258L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
45L
72L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpine A110 S 1.8Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Alpine A110 S 1.8: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpineA110S 1.86,400 rpm2,000-6,400 rpm6,650 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T5,600 rpm3,000-4,500 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpineA110S 1.8ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.3 s
23.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.5 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
188 km/h
117 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
292 hp
218 kW
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
275 hp
205 kW

Alpine A110 S 1.8 has 17 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Alpine A110 S 1.8: 17 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
1,114 kg
2,456 lb
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
1,512 kg
3,333 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.84.4 s
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T5.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
738 km
458 mi
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
766 km
476 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpineA110S 1.8
292 hp
218 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
275 hp
205 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpineA110S 1.8
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,180 mm
164.6 in
Height
1,248 mm
49.1 in
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpineA110S 1.8
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Alpine A110 S 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpineA110S 1.8
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
4.4 s
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpineA110S 1.8
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpineA110S 1.8ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
292 hp
218 kW
275 hp
205 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,114 kg
2,456 lb
1,512 kg
3,333 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,180 mm
164.6 in
Height
1,248 mm
49.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in
Range score
738 km
458 mi
766 km
476 mi
Trunk score
-
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpine A110 S 1.8Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpine A110 S 1.8

  • Has 17 hp more
  • Is 398 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 80 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Has 28 km (18 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpine A110 S 1.8
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 1.8
2.0
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsPorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
2.0 T
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 TvsChevroletCamaro VI2.0
S 1.8
2.0 TFSI
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsAUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
2.0 T
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 TvsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
S 1.8
P300
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
2.0 T
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 TvsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
S 1.8
M235i
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F44)M235i
2.0 T
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 TvsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
S 1.8
50 TDI V6
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)Facelift 201950 TDI V6
2.0 T
C 300
VS
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 TvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 300
S 1.8
2.0
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
2.0 T
E 350d
VS
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 TvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d
Alpine A110 S 1.8 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster