Chevrolet Camaro IV
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque441 Nm325 lb-ft
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Lightest1,512 kg3,333 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 285hp213kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 441Nm325lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,644kg3,624lb | 1,512kg3,333lb |
| Gross weight | 1,922kg4,237lb | - |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.8s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 82.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 23.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 766km476mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,737cc350cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,907mm193in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,897mm75in |
| Height | 1,303mm51in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,568mm101in | 2,811mm111in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,618mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 258L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 5,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 23.3 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 has 10 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5.9 s |
Although Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW | 6.0 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285 hp 213 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 766 km 476 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 41 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 107 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Is 132 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























