Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) CLK 430 V8vsChevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro IV
Z28 5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) CLK 430 V8
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.6 L/100 km14.2 mpg US17.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score77/100
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque441 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 279hp208kW | 285hp213kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 441Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,644kg3,624lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,922kg4,237lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 85.8s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 554km344mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,266cc260cu in | 5,737cc350cu in |
| Length | 4,567mm180in | 4,907mm193in |
| Width | 1,722mm68in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,303mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,474mm58in | 1,539mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) CLK 430 V8: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 3,000-4,400 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 5,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | 279 hp 208 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) CLK 430 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) CLK 430 V8 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | 6.4 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) CLK 430 V8: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | 279 hp 208 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW | 6.0 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8 | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 279 hp 208 kW | 285 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 554 km 344 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) CLK 430 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) CLK 430 V8
- Is 164 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 41 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























