Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018

2.0 T

275 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,512 kg
    3,333 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.7 L/100 km
    22.0 mpg US
    26.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    766 km
    476 mi
  • Largest trunk
    258 L
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    46/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
310hp231kW
275hp205kW
Torque
461Nm340lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,605kg3,538lb
1,512kg3,333lb
Gross weight
1,930kg4,255lb
-
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
86.8s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
82.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.0s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
22.8s
Calculated
23.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
512km318mi
Calculated
766km476mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,665cc346cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,914mm193in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,897mm75in
Height
1,315mm52in
1,348mm53in
Wheelbase
2,568mm101in
2,811mm111in
Front track
1,542mm61in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,540mm61in
1,618mm64in
Trunk volume
215L
258L
Max trunk volume
930L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
64L
72L
CO2 emissions
293g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85,200 rpm4,000 rpm5,450 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T5,600 rpm3,000-4,500 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.0 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.8 s
23.3 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 35 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
461 Nm
340 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
1,512 kg
3,333 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
257 km/h
160 mph
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
6.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
275 hp
205 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
6.0 s
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
310 hp
231 kW
275 hp
205 kW
Torque
461 Nm
340 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.0 s
5.9 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
1,512 kg
3,333 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in
Range score
512 km
318 mi
766 km
476 mi
CO2 score
293 g/km
-
Trunk score
215 L
7.6 cu ft
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Has 61 Nm more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T

  • Is 93 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 254 km (158 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 43 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster