Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0vsAlpine A110 S 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpine A110
S 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpine A110 S 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Lightest1,114 kg2,456 lb
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range738 km458 mi
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | AlpineA110S 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,114kg2,456lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 98.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.1s | 14.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 738km458mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,988cc121cu in | 1,800cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,180mm165in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,286mm51in | 1,248mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,419mm95in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,556mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,532mm60in | 1,553mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 275L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 185g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Alpine A110 S 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,150-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 6,400 rpm | 2,000-6,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | AlpineA110S 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.1 s | 14.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 292 hp 218 kW |
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 has 8 hp more than Alpine A110 S 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 1,114 kg 2,456 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 4.9 s |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 4.4 s |
Although Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 has more power, Alpine A110 S 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 738 km 458 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 292 hp 218 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpineA110S 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpineA110S 1.8 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpine A110 S 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | AlpineA110S 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,114 kg 2,456 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 738 km 458 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 185 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 | Alpine A110 S 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alpine A110 S 1.8
- Is 251 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























