Car comparison

Alpine A110 S 1.8vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpine A110

S 1.8

292 hp1800 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2019-2021
VS

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020

2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2019-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpine A110 S 1.8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,114 kg
    2,456 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    262 hp/t
    195 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    69/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    38/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpineA110S 1.8JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
Power
292hp218kW
300hp224kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,114kg2,456lb
1,520kg3,351lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
77.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
5.7s
0-200 km/h
14.3s
Calculated
19.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
5.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb
Calculated
197hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
738km458mi
Calculated
778km483mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,800cc110cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,180mm165in
4,470mm176in
Width
1,798mm71in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,248mm49in
1,311mm52in
Wheelbase
2,419mm95in
2,622mm103in
Front track
1,556mm61in
1,596mm63in
Rear track
1,553mm61in
1,647mm65in
Trunk volume-
299L
Max trunk volume-
509L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
45L
63L
CO2 emissions-
184g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpine A110 S 1.8Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0PowerTorque
  • Alpine A110 S 1.8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpineA110S 1.86,400 rpm2,000-6,400 rpm6,650 rpm
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpineA110S 1.8JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
5.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
5.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.3 s
19.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.5 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
188 km/h
117 mph
170 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
292 hp
218 kW
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
300 hp
224 kW

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0 has 8 hp more than Alpine A110 S 1.8.

The biggest power difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
1,114 kg
2,456 lb
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
1,520 kg
3,351 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.84.4 s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.05.7 s

Although Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0 has more power, Alpine A110 S 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110S 1.8
738 km
458 mi
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
778 km
483 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpineA110S 1.8
292 hp
218 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
300 hp
224 kW
5.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpineA110S 1.8
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,180 mm
164.6 in
Height
1,248 mm
49.1 in
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
299 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpineA110S 1.8
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Alpine A110 S 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpineA110S 1.8
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
4.4 s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
5.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpineA110S 1.8
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpineA110S 1.8JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
Power
292 hp
218 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,114 kg
2,456 lb
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,180 mm
164.6 in
Height
1,248 mm
49.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
299 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
Range score
738 km
458 mi
778 km
483 mi
CO2 score
-
184 g/km
Trunk score
-
299 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpine A110 S 1.8Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpine A110 S 1.8

  • Is 406 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpine A110 S 1.8
Jaguar F-type Coupe 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 1.8
2.0
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsPorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
2.0
P300
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
S 1.8
2.0 TFSI
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsAUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0vsJaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0
S 1.8
M235i
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F44)M235i
2.0
P300
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017P300
S 1.8
50 TDI V6
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)Facelift 201950 TDI V6
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0vsJaguarF-type Convertible3.0 V6
S 1.8
50 TDI
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)50 TDI
2.0
E 350
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350
S 1.8
435d
VS
AlpineA110S 1.8vsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)Facelift 2017435d
Alpine A110 S 1.8 vs Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster