Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGTvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Tonale

1.5 VGT

160 hp1469 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-2025
VS

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT

  • Fastest top speed
    212 km/h
    132 mph
  • Most powerful
    160 hp
    119 kW
  • Highest torque
    240 Nm
    177 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    846 km
    526 mi
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,293 kg
    2,851 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGTFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
160hp119kW
155hp116kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,525kg3,362lb
1,293kg2,851lb
Gross weight
2,135kg4,707lb
1,835kg4,045lb
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
88.8s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
51.1s
Calculated
50.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton
Calculated
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
846km526mi
Calculated
667km414mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,469cc90cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,528mm178in
4,186mm165in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,601mm63in
1,550mm61in
Wheelbase
2,636mm104in
2,588mm102in
Front track-
1,567mm62in
Rear track-
1,526mm60in
Ground clearance
156mm6in
163mm6in
Trunk volume
500L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGTFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT5,750 rpm1,500 rpm6,000 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGTFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
51.1 s
50.6 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
160 hp
119 kW
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT has 5 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
1,525 kg
3,362 lb
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1,293 kg
2,851 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
212 km/h
132 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT8.8 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost8.7 s

Although Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
846 km
526 mi
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
667 km
414 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
160 hp
119 kW
8.8 s
212 km/h
132 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
Power
160 hp
119 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,528 mm
178.3 in
Height
1,601 mm
63.0 in
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
Power
160 hp
119 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.8 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGTFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
160 hp
119 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.7 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,525 kg
3,362 lb
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,528 mm
178.3 in
Height
1,601 mm
63.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Range score
846 km
526 mi
667 km
414 mi
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGTFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 179 km (112 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 44 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 232 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT vs Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster