Alfa Romeo Tonale · Facelift 2025
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Tonale · Facelift 2025 1.5 VGTvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma · Facelift 2024
1.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful160 hp119 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range932 km579 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Lightest1,293 kg2,851 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160hp119kW | 155hp116kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,293kg2,851lb |
| Gross weight | 2,135kg4,707lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.4s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.2s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 932km579mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,469cc90cu in | 999cc61cu in |
| Length | 4,522mm178in | 4,186mm165in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,601mm63in | 1,550mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,526mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 156mm6in | 163mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 42L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.2 s | - |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 160 hp 119 kW |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW |
Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT has 5 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 200 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 8.5 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 932 km 579 mi |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.7 s | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp 119 kW | 155 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 932 km 579 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 266 km (165 mi) more estimated range
- Has 44 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Is 232 kg lighter
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























