Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.0

280 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    169 hp/t
    126 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    161 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    914 km
    568 mi
  • Largest trunk
    525 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
280hp209kW
310hp231kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
2,016kg4,445lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
64.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.7s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
22.3s
Calculated
23.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.4s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
914km568mi
Calculated
910km566mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,687mm185in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,903mm75in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,671mm66in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,818mm111in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,613mm64in
-
Rear track
1,653mm65in
-
Ground clearance
200mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
525L
505L
Max trunk volume-
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
64L
71L
CO2 emissions
161g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.05,250 rpm2,250 rpm5,500 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.4 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.7 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.3 s
23.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
280 hp
209 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 30 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2,016 kg
4,445 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.05.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
914 km
568 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
280 hp
209 kW
5.7 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
5.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
280 hp
209 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.7 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
914 km
568 mi
910 km
566 mi
CO2 score
161 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
525 L
18.5 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Is 356 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 4 km (3 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 20 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 30 hp more

Pros

  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0 Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2.0
2.0 T4
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0
3.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
2.0 T6
30t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace30t
2.0
Veloce 54 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoJuniorVeloce 54 kWh
2.0 T6
2.0 P300
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0 T6
3.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0
2.0 T6
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0
50 TDI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster