Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0vsLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport
2.0 Si4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions161 g/km
- Best estimated range914 km568 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score88/100
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
- Most powerful290 hp216 kW
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,947kg4,292lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,710kg5,975lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 85.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s Calculated | 32.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 914km568mi Calculated | 815km507mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,687mm185in | 4,599mm181in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | - |
| Height | 1,671mm66in | 1,724mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,613mm64in | 1,621mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 525L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 5,800 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 32.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 1,947 kg 4,292 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 5.7 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 6.7 s |
Although Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 815 km 507 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 290 hp 216 kW | 6.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,947 kg 4,292 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 914 km 568 mi | 815 km 507 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 | Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Is 287 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 99 km (61 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
- Has 10 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























