Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 35ivsLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

35i

306 hp2979 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Land Rover Discovery Sport

2.0 Si4

290 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 35i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    306 hp
    228 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    151 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    988 km
    614 mi
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

  • Lightest
    1,947 kg
    4,292 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    190 g/km
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)35iLand RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
306hp228kW
290hp216kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,025kg4,464lb
1,947kg4,292lb
Gross weight
2,740kg6,041lb
2,710kg5,975lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
84.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
91.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
27.1s
Calculated
34.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
988km614mi
Calculated
815km507mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,599mm181in
Width
1,989mm78in
2,069mm81in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,724mm68in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,741mm108in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,621mm64in
Rear track
1,706mm67in
1,630mm64in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
221mm9in
Trunk volume
550L
-
Max trunk volume
1,525L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
85L
69L
CO2 emissions
200g/km
190g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 35iLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 35i: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)35i5,800-6,400 rpm1,200-5,000 rpm6,650 rpm
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si45,800 rpm1,500 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)35iLand RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.1 s
34.0 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
306 hp
228 kW
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
290 hp
216 kW

BMW X6 (F16) 35i has 16 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 and BMW X6 (F16) 35i: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
2,025 kg
4,464 lb
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
1,947 kg
4,292 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
240 km/h
149 mph
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
228 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i6.4 s
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si46.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 35i and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
988 km
614 mi
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
815 km
507 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)35i
306 hp
228 kW
6.4 s
240 km/h
149 mph
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
290 hp
216 kW
6.7 s
228 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,724 mm
67.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)35i
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.4 s
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)35i
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)35iLand RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
306 hp
228 kW
290 hp
216 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
6.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
2,025 kg
4,464 lb
1,947 kg
4,292 lb
Fuel consumption
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,724 mm
67.9 in
Range score
988 km
614 mi
815 km
507 mi
CO2 score
200 g/km
190 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 35iLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.05 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.22 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,258 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 35i

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 173 km (107 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

  • Is 78 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 35i
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

35i
35i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX6 (E71)35i
2.0 Si4
3.0 TDI
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
35i
40i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX6 (G06)40i
2.0 Si4
2.0t
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
35i
30d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX6 (G06 LCI)Facelift 202330d
2.0 Si4
2.0
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
35i
35i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i
2.0 Si4
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
35i
40d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d
2.0 Si4
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
35i
35d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX3 (F25)35d
2.0 Si4
50 TDI V6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
BMW X6 (F16) 35i vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster