Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Land Rover Discovery Sport

2.0 Si4

290 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,941 kg
    4,279 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    160 hp/t
    119 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    181 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    910 km
    566 mi
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
310hp231kW
290hp216kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,941kg4,279lb
1,947kg4,292lb
Gross weight
2,450kg5,401lb
2,710kg5,975lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
228 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
70.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
85.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
23.6s
Calculated
32.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
910km566mi
Calculated
815km507mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,599mm181in
Width
1,902mm75in
-
Height
1,658mm65in
1,724mm68in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,741mm108in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,621mm64in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,630mm64in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
221mm9in
Trunk volume
505L
-
Max trunk volume
1,432L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
71L
69L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
190g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,200-5,100 rpm5,950 rpm
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si45,800 rpm1,500 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.6 s
32.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
228 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
102 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
290 hp
216 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 20 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
1,947 kg
4,292 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
228 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si46.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
815 km
507 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
290 hp
216 kW
6.7 s
228 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,724 mm
67.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
310 hp
231 kW
290 hp
216 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
1,947 kg
4,292 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,724 mm
67.9 in
Range score
910 km
566 mi
815 km
507 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
190 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 6 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 95 km (59 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 9 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2.0 Si4
3.0 TDI
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 Si4
2.0t
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0 Si4
2.0
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2.0 Si4
50 TDI V6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 T6
40d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsBMWX6 (F16)40d
2.0 Si4
2.0 P300
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0 Si4
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
2.0 Si4
3.0d
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster