AUDI Q8 (4M)
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6vsLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport
2.0 Si4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions178 g/km
- Best estimated range1,103 km685 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
- Most powerful290 hp216 kW
- Lightest1,947 kg4,292 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 1,947kg4,292lb |
| Gross weight | 2,890kg6,371lb | 2,710kg5,975lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 91.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,103km685mi Calculated | 815km507mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,599mm181in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 2,069mm81in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,724mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,621mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 254mm10in | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 2,250-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 5,800 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 286 hp 213 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 has 4 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 1,947 kg 4,292 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.3 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 6.7 s |
Although Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 has more power, AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 1,103 km 685 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 815 km 507 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 290 hp 216 kW | 6.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb | 1,947 kg 4,292 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,103 km 685 mi | 815 km 507 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 | Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 287 km (179 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 198 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























