AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDIvsLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport
2.0 Si4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,870 kg4,123 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range1,048 km651 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score90/100
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
- Most powerful290 hp216 kW
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 1,947kg4,292lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 2,710kg5,975lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 91.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,048km651mi Calculated | 815km507mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,599mm181in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 2,069mm81in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,724mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,621mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 5,800 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 has 4 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 1,947 kg 4,292 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 5.8 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 6.7 s |
Although Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 1,048 km 651 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 815 km 507 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.8 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 290 hp 216 kW | 6.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | 1,947 kg 4,292 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,048 km 651 mi | 815 km 507 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI | Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
- Has 220 Nm more
- Is 77 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 233 km (145 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
- Has 4 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























