Car comparison

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VvsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Morgan Aero 8

4.4 i V8 32V

286 hp4398 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2000-2010
VS

Alfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003

3.2 V6

240 hp3179 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2003-2004

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    257 km/h
    160 mph
  • Most powerful
    286 hp
    213 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,000 kg
    2,205 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    286 hp/t
    213 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.4 L/100 km
    19.0 mpg US
    22.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.4 L/100 km
    12.8 mpg US
    15.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    565 km
    351 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    69/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    34/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VAlfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
Power
286hp213kW
240hp179kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
289Nm213lb-ft
Curb weight
1,000kg2,205lb
1,470kg3,241lb
Gross weight
1,300kg2,866lb
1,730kg3,814lb
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
242 km/h
150 mph
To 99% top speed
52.5s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
84.5s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.0s
6.3s
0-200 km/h
16.2s
Calculated
26.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.8s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK
19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
430Nm/t288lb-ft/ton
Calculated
197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
565km351mi
Calculated
530km330mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,398cc268cu in
3,179cc194cu in
Length
4,120mm162in
4,299mm169in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,776mm70in
Height
1,200mm47in
1,315mm52in
Wheelbase
2,525mm99in
2,540mm100in
Front track
1,550mm61in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,500mm59in
1,508mm59in
Trunk volume-
147L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
70L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VAlfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6PowerTorque
  • Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V5,500 rpm3,700 rpm5,750 rpm
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V66,200 rpm4,800 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VAlfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.8 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.0 s
6.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.2 s
26.4 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
242 km/h
150 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.6 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
181 km/h
113 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp
213 kW
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
240 hp
179 kW

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V has 46 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: 46 hp (34 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
289 Nm
213 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
1,000 kg
2,205 lb
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
1,470 kg
3,241 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
257 km/h
160 mph
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
242 km/h
150 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
565 km
351 mi
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
530 km
330 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp
213 kW
5.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
240 hp
179 kW
6.3 s
242 km/h
150 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,120 mm
162.2 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
147 L
5.2 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
5.0 s
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
6.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VAlfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
Power
286 hp
213 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
289 Nm
213 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.0 s
6.3 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
242 km/h
150 mph
Lightness
1,000 kg
2,205 lb
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,120 mm
162.2 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
147 L
5.2 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Range score
565 km
351 mi
530 km
330 mi
Trunk score
-
147 L
5.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMorgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VAlfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km23.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi37.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year3,465 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V

  • Has 46 hp more
  • Has 141 Nm more
  • Is 470 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 123 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.2 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V vs Alfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster