Morgan Aero 8
Car comparison
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VvsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003
3.2 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,000 kg2,205 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.4 L/100 km12.8 mpg US15.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range565 km351 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score34/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 289Nm213lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,000kg2,205lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,300kg2,866lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.5s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 430Nm/t288lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 565km351mi Calculated | 530km330mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 3,179cc194cu in |
| Length | 4,120mm162in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,776mm70in |
| Height | 1,200mm47in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,525mm99in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,500mm59in | 1,508mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 147L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 5,500 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V has 46 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: 46 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 565 km 351 mi |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 530 km 330 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.3 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 565 km 351 mi | 530 km 330 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 147 L 5.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V | Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
- Has 46 hp more
- Has 141 Nm more
- Is 470 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 123 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























