Alfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6vsAlfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (939)
3.2 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque322 Nm237 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range574 km357 mi
- Largest trunk253 L
- Best overall score50/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 289Nm213lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | - |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.5s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 99.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.4s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km330mi Calculated | 574km357mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,393mm173in |
| Width | 1,776mm70in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,318mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 147L | 253L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.4 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 7.0 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 has more power, Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 530 km 330 mi |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 574 km 357 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.3 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.0 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 330 mi | 574 km 357 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 147 L 5.2 cu ft | 253 L 8.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Is 295 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 33 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 43 km (27 mi) more estimated range
- Has 106 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























