Alfa Romeo Spider (939)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6vsBMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 1 Series Convertible (E88)
125i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range654 km407 mi
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque322 Nm237 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 322Nm237lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 88.3s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.0s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t108kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 654km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,195cc195cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,393mm173in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,748mm69in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,411mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,528mm100in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,474mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,507mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 253L | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 305L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 195g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- BMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 6,100 rpm | 2,500-4,250 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.0 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 218 hp 163 kW |
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 has 42 hp more than BMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 7.0 s |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 6.8 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 has more power, BMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 4.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 574 km 357 mi |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 654 km 407 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.0 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | BMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 654 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 195 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 253 L 8.9 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 | BMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 52 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW 1 Series Convertible (E88) 125i
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 81 km (50 mi) more estimated range
- Has 7 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























