AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) 3.2 FSI V6vsAlfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (939)
3.2 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) 3.2 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range674 km419 mi
- Largest trunk320 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,785kg3,935lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Gross weight | 2,285kg5,038lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 99.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 674km419mi Calculated | 574km357mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,197cc195cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,625mm182in | 4,393mm173in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,318mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,751mm108in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 320L | 253L |
| Max trunk volume | 750L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 219g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) 3.2 FSI V6 has 5 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 and AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) 3.2 FSI V6: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) 3.2 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) 3.2 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 674 km 419 mi |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 574 km 357 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.0 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 674 km 419 mi | 574 km 357 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 219 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | 253 L 8.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) 3.2 FSI V6 | Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 8 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
- Has 67 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
- Is 20 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























