Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0vsAcura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura TL III (UA6/7)
3.2 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque355 Nm262 lb-ft
- Lightest1,445 kg3,186 lb
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t137 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score78/100
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful273 hp204 kW
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk454 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 273hp204kW |
| Torque | 355Nm262lb-ft | 323Nm238lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 1,885kg4,156lb | - |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 55.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 20.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 3,210cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,490mm177in | 4,808mm189in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 454L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 258g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
- Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 20.8 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 273 hp 204 kW |
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V has 8 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 355 Nm 262 lb-ft |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6.1 s |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 273 hp 204 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 273 hp 204 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 355 Nm 262 lb-ft | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 258 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 454 L 16.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Has 32 Nm more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























