Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24VvsAcura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura TL III (UA6/7)
3.2 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful273 hp204 kW
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 273hp204kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 323Nm238lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 55.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s Calculated | 20.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,922cc178cu in | 3,210cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,822mm190in | 4,808mm189in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 454L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,126L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 272g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: Power / Torque
- Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 5,200 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 20.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 272 hp 203 kW |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 273 hp 204 kW |
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V has 1 hp more than Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V and Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 7.2 s |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 273 hp 204 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 273 hp 204 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 272 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 454 L 16.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
- Has 57 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 6 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























