AC Ace
Car comparison
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V TurbovsBentley Azure 6.8 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Azure
6.8 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8
- Most powerful408 hp304 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Largest trunk193 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score59/100
- Best practicality score43/100
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption20.0 L/100 km11.8 mpg US14.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 108.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.2s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 25.8L/100 km9.1mpg US10.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 562km349mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,506cc214cu in | 6,748cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,420mm174in | 5,350mm211in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 193L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.2 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 354 hp 264 kW |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW |
Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 has 54 hp more than AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo and Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 5.5 s |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 6.7 s |
Although Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 has more power, AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo and Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 17.8 L/100 km 13.2 mpg US 15.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 562 km 349 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 193 L 6.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.8 L/100 km13.2 mpg US15.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 31.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 50.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,670 L705 US gal587 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,673 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
- Is 1,100 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 78 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8
- Has 54 hp more
- Has 343 Nm more
- Has 8 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























