Car comparison

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9vsBentley Azure 6.8 i V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW Z8 (E52)

4.9

400 hp4941 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2000-2005
VS

Bentley Azure

6.8 i V8

408 hp6748 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCabriolet / convertible1995-2005

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    241 hp/t
    180 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    14.5 L/100 km
    16.2 mpg US
    19.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    21.1 L/100 km
    11.1 mpg US
    13.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    203 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100
  • Best economy score
    68/100

Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8

  • Most powerful
    408 hp
    304 kW
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    562 km
    349 mi
  • Best practicality score
    43/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWZ8 (E52)4.9BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
Power
400hp298kW
408hp304kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
750Nm553lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
2,610kg5,754lb
Gross weight
1,900kg4,189lb
2,980kg6,570lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
108.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
16.3s
Calculated
28.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK
17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK
25.8L/100 km9.1mpg US10.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb
Calculated
156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton
Calculated
287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
503km313mi
Calculated
562km349mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,941cc302cu in
6,748cc412cu in
Length
4,400mm173in
5,350mm211in
Width
1,830mm72in
1,878mm74in
Height
1,317mm52in
1,475mm58in
Wheelbase
2,505mm99in
3,061mm121in
Front track
1,550mm61in
1,549mm61in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,549mm61in
Trunk volume
203L
193L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
73L
100L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8PowerTorque
  • BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWZ8 (E52)4.96,600 rpm3,800 rpm6,850 rpm
BentleyAzure6.8 i V84,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWZ8 (E52)4.9BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.3 s
28.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
180 km/h
112 mph
154 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
400 hp
298 kW
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
408 hp
304 kW

Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 has 8 hp more than BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9.

The biggest power difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
2,610 kg
5,754 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.94.7 s
BentleyAzure6.8 i V86.7 s

Although Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 has more power, BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: 2.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
17.8 L/100 km
13.2 mpg US
15.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
503 km
313 mi
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
562 km
349 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
400 hp
298 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
408 hp
304 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
203 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,317 mm
51.9 in
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
Power
408 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
193 L
6.8 cu ft
Length
5,350 mm
210.6 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
Power
408 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
17.8 L/100 km
13.2 mpg US
15.9 mpg UK

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
4.7 s
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
17.8 L/100 km
13.2 mpg US
15.9 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
17.8 L/100 km
13.2 mpg US
15.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWZ8 (E52)4.9BentleyAzure6.8 i V8
Power
400 hp
298 kW
408 hp
304 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
2,610 kg
5,754 lb
Fuel consumption
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
17.8 L/100 km
13.2 mpg US
15.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
203 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,317 mm
51.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
193 L
6.8 cu ft
Length
5,350 mm
210.6 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Range score
503 km
313 mi
562 km
349 mi
Trunk score
203 L
7.2 cu ft
193 L
6.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW Z8 (E52) 4.9Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8
Consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK17.8 L/100 km13.2 mpg US15.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.38 LC100 km31.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi40.84 LC100 mi50.13 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal2,670 L705 US gal587 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,806 LC/year4,673 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9

  • Is 950 kg lighter
  • Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 85 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 10 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 250 Nm more
  • Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.9
3.2i 24V
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V
6.8 i V8
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)650i
6.8 i V8
5.9 V12
VS
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8vsAston MartinDB7 Volante5.9 V12
4.9
4.0 V8
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
6.8 i V8
360 Spider
VS
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8vsFerrari360 Modena Spider360 Spider
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007650i
6.8 i V8
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8
4.9
5.0 V10
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
6.8 i V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (F12)650i
6.8 i V8
4.2 i V8 32V
VS
BentleyAzure6.8 i V8vsMaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 vs Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster