Maserati Spyder
Car comparison
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32VvsBentley Azure 6.8 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Azure
6.8 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption25.0 L/100 km9.4 mpg US11.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score64/100
Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8
- Most powerful408 hp304 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best estimated range562 km349 mi
- Best practicality score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 451Nm333lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 108.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | 25.8L/100 km9.1mpg US10.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 553km344mi Calculated | 562km349mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,244cc259cu in | 6,748cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,303mm169in | 5,350mm211in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,440mm96in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 193L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW |
Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 has 18 hp more than Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 6.7 s |
Although Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 has more power, Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 17.8 L/100 km 13.2 mpg US 15.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 562 km 349 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW | 5.0 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 |
| 17.8 L/100 km 13.2 mpg US 15.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 17.8 L/100 km 13.2 mpg US 15.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 17.8 L/100 km 13.2 mpg US 15.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 17.8 L/100 km 13.2 mpg US 15.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 553 km 344 mi | 562 km 349 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 193 L 6.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V | Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK | 17.8 L/100 km13.2 mpg US15.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.83 LC100 km | 31.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi | 50.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal | 2,670 L705 US gal587 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,174 LC/year | 4,673 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
- Is 890 kg lighter
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 70 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 299 Nm more
- Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























