Car comparison

Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32VvsJaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati Spyder

4.2 i V8 32V

390 hp4244 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2007
VS

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150)

R 4.2 V8

416 hp4196 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCabriolet / convertible2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8

  • Most powerful
    416 hp
    310 kW
  • Highest torque
    560 Nm
    413 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,710 kg
    3,770 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    243 hp/t
    181 kW/t
    4.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    19.1 L/100 km
    12.3 mpg US
    14.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    578 km
    359 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    41/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VJaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
Power
390hp291kW
416hp310kW
Torque
451Nm333lb-ft
560Nm413lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
1,710kg3,770lb
Gross weight
1,980kg4,365lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.7s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
67.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.0s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
16.2s
Calculated
18.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.8s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK
19.1L/100 km12.3mpg US14.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton
Calculated
327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
553km344mi
Calculated
578km359mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,244cc259cu in
4,196cc256cu in
Length
4,303mm169in
4,791mm189in
Width
1,822mm72in
-
Height
1,305mm51in
1,329mm52in
Wheelbase
2,440mm96in
2,752mm108in
Front track
1,525mm60in
-
Rear track
1,538mm61in
-
Ground clearance-
120mm5in
Trunk volume
300L
200L
Max trunk volume-
283L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
88L
71L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32VJaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V7,000 rpm4,500 rpm7,250 rpm
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V86,250 rpm4,000 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VJaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.8 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.0 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.2 s
18.6 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.6 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
180 km/h
112 mph
174 km/h
108 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
390 hp
291 kW
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
416 hp
310 kW

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 has 26 hp more than Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
451 Nm
333 lb-ft
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
560 Nm
413 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
1,710 kg
3,770 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
283 km/h
176 mph
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V5.0 s
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V85.3 s

Although Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 has more power, Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 and Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
243 hp/t
181 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
553 km
344 mi
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
578 km
359 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
390 hp
291 kW
5.0 s
283 km/h
176 mph
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
416 hp
310 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
Power
390 hp
291 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,303 mm
169.4 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
Power
416 hp
310 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
Power
390 hp
291 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
Power
416 hp
310 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
5.0 s
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
5.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
243 hp/t
181 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VJaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
Power
390 hp
291 kW
416 hp
310 kW
Torque
451 Nm
333 lb-ft
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.0 s
5.3 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
Fuel consumption
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,303 mm
169.4 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in
Range score
553 km
344 mi
578 km
359 mi
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
243 hp/t
181 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32VJaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8
Consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.83 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi44.78 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,174 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8

  • Has 26 hp more
  • Has 109 Nm more
  • Is 10 kg lighter
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 25 km (15 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.2 i V8 32V
4.7
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsMaseratiGranCabrio I4.7
R 4.2 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8
R 4.2 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
4.3 i V8 32V
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsAston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V
R 4.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
4.9
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsBMWZ8 (E52)4.9
R 4.2 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
360 Spider
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsFerrari360 Modena Spider360 Spider
R 4.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
5.9 V12
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsAston MartinDB7 Volante5.9 V12
R 4.2 V8
4.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8vsBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V vs Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster