BMW M3 Convertible (E93)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8vsJaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XK Convertible (X150)
R 4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight243 hp/t181 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range578 km359 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score74/100
BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Lowest city consumption18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk210 L
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.2s | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK | 19.1L/100 km12.3mpg US14.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 488km303mi Calculated | 578km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,999cc244cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,615mm182in | 4,791mm189in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,892mm74in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,329mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | 2,752mm108in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 210L | 200L |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | 283L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 71L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.2 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW |
BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 and BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 5.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 and BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 488 km 303 mi |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 578 km 359 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 488 km 303 mi | 578 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 | Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.58 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,386 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8
- Has 160 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 90 km (56 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























