AC Ace
Car comparison
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V TurbovsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Z28 5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score68/100
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Highest torque472 Nm348 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk215 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 472Nm348lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.2s Calculated | 21.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 538km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,506cc214cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,420mm174in | 4,914mm193in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 215L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 278g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.2 s | 21.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 354 hp 264 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo has 44 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: 44 hp (33 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 5.5 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 538 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 278 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
- Has 44 hp more
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 65 Nm more
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























