Car comparison

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9vsAC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW Z8 (E52)

4.9

400 hp4941 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2000-2005
VS

AC Ace

3.5 i V8 32V Turbo

354 hp3506 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCabriolet / convertible1999-2000

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    400 hp
    298 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    241 hp/t
    180 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    203 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100
  • Best economy score
    68/100
  • Best practicality score
    32/100

AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo

  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Lowest city consumption
    20.0 L/100 km
    11.8 mpg US
    14.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWZ8 (E52)4.9ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Power
400hp298kW
354hp264kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
407Nm300lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,510kg3,329lb
Gross weight
1,900kg4,189lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
69.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
16.3s
Calculated
19.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK
20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
13.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb
Calculated
234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton
Calculated
270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
503km313mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
4,941cc302cu in
3,506cc214cu in
Length
4,400mm173in
4,420mm174in
Width
1,830mm72in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,317mm52in
1,300mm51in
Wheelbase
2,505mm99in
2,470mm97in
Front track
1,550mm61in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,570mm62in
Trunk volume
203L
185L
Max trunk volume-
300L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
73L
90L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V TurboPowerTorque
  • BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: Power / Torque
  • AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWZ8 (E52)4.96,600 rpm3,800 rpm6,850 rpm
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo6,500 rpm4,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWZ8 (E52)4.9ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.3 s
19.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
180 km/h
112 mph
172 km/h
107 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
400 hp
298 kW
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
354 hp
264 kW

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 has 46 hp more than AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 46 hp (34 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
407 Nm
300 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
1,510 kg
3,329 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.94.7 s
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo5.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: 0.8 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
234 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
400 hp
298 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
354 hp
264 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
203 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,317 mm
51.9 in
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Power
354 hp
264 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
185 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWZ8 (E52)4.9ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Power
400 hp
298 kW
354 hp
264 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
407 Nm
300 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Fuel consumption
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
203 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,317 mm
51.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
185 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Range score
503 km
313 mi
-
Trunk score
203 L
7.2 cu ft
185 L
6.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
234 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
Consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi40.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,806 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9

  • Has 46 hp more
  • Has 93 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 18 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.9
3.2i 24V
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V TurbovsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)650i
4.9
4.0 V8
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
3.2
VS
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V TurbovsBMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007650i
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V TurbovsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8
4.9
5.0 V10
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V TurbovsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (F12)650i
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
6.7 i V8
VS
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V TurbovsBentleyAzure6.7 i V8
4.9
360 Spider
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsFerrari360 Modena Spider360 Spider
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 vs AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster