Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8vsAC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAC Ace
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption18.2 L/100 km12.9 mpg US15.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk276 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score44/100
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 354hp264kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 407Nm300lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.1s Calculated | 19.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 292Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 504km313mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 3,506cc214cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,420mm174in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,470mm97in |
| Front track | 1,495mm59in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,474mm58in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 276L | 185L |
| Max trunk volume | 390L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
- AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.1 s | 19.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 354 hp 264 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 has 13 hp more than AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5.4 s |
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 and AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 354 hp 264 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 504 km 313 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 103 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 91 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























