Car comparison

AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V TurbovsMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
354 hp3506 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCabriolet / convertible1999-2000
VS

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999

AMG CLK 55 V8

347 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1999-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    354 hp
    264 kW
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    234 hp/t
    175 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    68/100

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8

  • Highest torque
    510 Nm
    376 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.1 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelACAce3.5 i V8 32V TurboMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Power
354hp264kW
347hp259kW
Torque
407Nm300lb-ft
510Nm376lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Gross weight-
2,080kg4,586lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
19.2s
Calculated
21.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.2s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.6s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb
Calculated
207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
530km329mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,506cc214cu in
5,439cc332cu in
Length
4,420mm174in
4,567mm180in
Width
1,870mm74in
1,722mm68in
Height
1,300mm51in
1,380mm54in
Wheelbase
2,470mm97in
2,690mm106in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,505mm59in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,488mm59in
Trunk volume
185L
-
Max trunk volume
300L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
90L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V TurboMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8PowerTorque
  • AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo6,500 rpm4,000 rpm6,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V85,500 rpm3,000-4,300 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricACAce3.5 i V8 32V TurboMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.2 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.2 s
21.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.6 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
172 km/h
107 mph
165 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
354 hp
264 kW
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
347 hp
259 kW

AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
407 Nm
300 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
510 Nm
376 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
1,680 kg
3,704 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 0.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
234 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
207 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
354 hp
264 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
347 hp
259 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Power
354 hp
264 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
185 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,380 mm
54.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleACAce3.5 i V8 32V TurboMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Power
354 hp
264 kW
347 hp
259 kW
Torque
407 Nm
300 lb-ft
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
Fuel consumption
-
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
185 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,380 mm
54.3 in
Range score
-
530 km
329 mi
Trunk score
185 L
6.5 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
234 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
207 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
Consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.47 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.95 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,071 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 170 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) AMG CLK 55 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo vs Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster