Abarth Pulse
Car comparison
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270vsSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk835 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Lightest1,281 kg2,824 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,281kg2,824lb | 1,849kg4,076lb |
| Gross weight | 1,681kg3,706lb | 2,409kg5,311lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.2s Calculated | 43.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 829km515mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,115mm162in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,544mm61in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,532mm100in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,484mm58in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 188mm7in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 835L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,065L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 5,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.2 s | 43.6 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 and Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 1,281 kg 2,824 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 7.6 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
Although Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI has more power, Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,281 kg 2,824 lb | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 829 km 515 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 835 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
- Is 568 kg lighter
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 465 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























