Images may not match the exact vehicle variant.
360 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2007-2016
0-100 km/h 3.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Performance
| Power | 360hp268kW+120 hp |
|---|---|
| Torque | 481Nm354lb-ft+171 Nm |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Curb weight | 790kg1,742lb |
| Power-to-weight | 456hp/t340kW/t207hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 608Nm/t407lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s-0.9 s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.2s-6.6 s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s-0.8 s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s-1.3 s Calculated |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 34.0s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph-8.6 s Calculated |
Efficiency and range
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
|---|---|
| Fuel tank | 40L |
| Estimated range | 513km319mi Calculated |
Engine and drivetrain
| Body type | Roadster |
|---|---|
| Fuel type | Gasoline |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged |
| Drive type | RWD |
| Transmission | Manual |
| Gears | 6-speed |
| Engine layout | Middle, Transverse |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinders | 4 |
| Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Dimensions and space
| Length | 3,738mm147in |
|---|---|
| Width | 1,915mm75in |
| Height | 1,202mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in |
| Seats | 2 |
Performance spider chart
Current vehicle compared with the precomputed median score across the database.
Power benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3) | 360 hp 268 kW |
| Database median | 262 hp 195 kW |
0-100 km/h benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · s
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3) | 3.0 s |
| Database median | 6.4 s |
Top speed benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Top speed. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3) | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Database median | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Fuel consumption benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3) | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Database median | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3) |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year |
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3)PowerTorque
- KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3): Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3) | 6,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
KTM X-Bow R 2.0
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotus2-Eleven1.8
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsBMWZ4 (E89)28i
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (981)2.7
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R