Car comparison

AUDI TT Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSIvsKTM X-Bow R 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TT Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010

2.0 TFSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2010-2014
VS

KTM X-Bow

R 2.0

240 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2007-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow R 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    790 kg
    1,742 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    304 hp/t
    227 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    52/100
  • Best performance score
    64/100

AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    811 km
    504 mi
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    31/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIKTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
211hp157kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
310Nm229lb-ft
Curb weight
1,425kg3,142lb
790kg1,742lb
Gross weight
1,745kg3,847lb
-
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
42.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
24.0s
Calculated
16.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
304hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
392Nm/t263lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
811km504mi
Calculated
513km319mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,198mm165in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,842mm73in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,358mm53in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,468mm97in
2,430mm96in
Front track
1,572mm62in
1,672mm66in
Rear track
1,558mm61in
1,626mm64in
Trunk volume
250L
-
Max trunk volume
700L
-
Doors
2
-
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
60L
40L
CO2 emissions
172g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSIKTM X-Bow R 2.0PowerTorque
  • AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow R 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI4,300-6,000 rpm1,600-4,200 rpm6,250 rpm
KTMX-BowR 2.06,500 rpm2,000 rpm7,200 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIKTMX-BowR 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.0 s
16.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
181 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
211 hp
157 kW
KTMX-BowR 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

KTM X-Bow R 2.0 has 29 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI and KTM X-Bow R 2.0: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
KTMX-BowR 2.0
310 Nm
229 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
KTMX-BowR 2.0
790 kg
1,742 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
240 km/h
149 mph
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI5.9 s
KTMX-BowR 2.03.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow R 2.0 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 2.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
KTMX-BowR 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
KTMX-BowR 2.0
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
811 km
504 mi
KTMX-BowR 2.0
513 km
319 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
211 hp
157 kW
5.9 s
240 km/h
149 mph
KTMX-BowR 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
250 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,198 mm
165.3 in
Height
1,358 mm
53.5 in
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow R 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
5.9 s
KTMX-BowR 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
KTMX-BowR 2.0
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIKTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
211 hp
157 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
3.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
790 kg
1,742 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
250 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,198 mm
165.3 in
Height
1,358 mm
53.5 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
811 km
504 mi
513 km
319 mi
CO2 score
172 g/km
-
Trunk score
250 L
8.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSIKTM X-Bow R 2.0
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 298 km (185 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

KTM X-Bow R 2.0

  • Has 29 hp more
  • Is 635 kg lighter
  • Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 156 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
KTM X-Bow R 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
R 2.0
1.8
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotus2-Eleven1.8
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
R 2.0
S Cup 1.8
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
R 2.0
28i
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsBMWZ4 (E89)28i
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
R 2.0
2.9
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9
2.0 TFSI
1.8 T
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
2.0 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8S)Facelift 201840 TFSI
R 2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI vs KTM X-Bow R 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster