Car comparison

Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8vsKTM X-Bow R 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lotus 2-Eleven

1.8

255 hp1796 ccGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedRoadster2007-2011
VS

KTM X-Bow

R 2.0

240 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2007-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8

  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    255 hp
    190 kW
  • Lightest
    745 kg
    1,642 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    342 hp/t
    255 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best practicality score
    27/100

KTM X-Bow R 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Highest torque
    310 Nm
    229 lb-ft
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLotus2-Eleven1.8KTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
255hp190kW
240hp179kW
Torque
242Nm178lb-ft
310Nm229lb-ft
Curb weight
745kg1,642lb
790kg1,742lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
37.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
42.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
13.9s
Calculated
16.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.0s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
342hp/t255kW/t155hp/1000 lb
Calculated
304hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton
Calculated
392Nm/t263lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
513km319mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,796cc110cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
3,822mm150in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,735mm68in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,112mm44in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,300mm91in
2,430mm96in
Front track-
1,672mm66in
Rear track-
1,626mm64in
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
40L
40L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8KTM X-Bow R 2.0PowerTorque
  • Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow R 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lotus2-Eleven1.88,000 rpm7,000 rpm8,250 rpm
KTMX-BowR 2.06,500 rpm2,000 rpm7,200 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLotus2-Eleven1.8KTMX-BowR 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.9 s
16.8 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.0 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
189 km/h
118 mph
181 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
255 hp
190 kW
KTMX-BowR 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8 has 15 hp more than KTM X-Bow R 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow R 2.0 and Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
242 Nm
178 lb-ft
KTMX-BowR 2.0
310 Nm
229 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
745 kg
1,642 lb
KTMX-BowR 2.0
790 kg
1,742 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
241 km/h
150 mph
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.84.0 s
KTMX-BowR 2.03.9 s

Although Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8 has more power, KTM X-Bow R 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow R 2.0 and Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
342 hp/t
255 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
KTMX-BowR 2.0
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
255 hp
190 kW
4.0 s
241 km/h
150 mph
KTMX-BowR 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,822 mm
150.5 in
Height
1,112 mm
43.8 in
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLotus2-Eleven1.8KTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
255 hp
190 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
242 Nm
178 lb-ft
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
3.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
745 kg
1,642 lb
790 kg
1,742 lb
Fuel consumption
-
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,822 mm
150.5 in
Height
1,112 mm
43.8 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
-
513 km
319 mi
Power-to-weight score
342 hp/t
255 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKTM X-Bow R 2.0
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

KTM X-Bow R 2.0

  • Has 68 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8
KTM X-Bow R 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8
Cup 250 1.8
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
1.8
1.8 i 16V 111R
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsLotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R
R 2.0
28i
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsBMWZ4 (E89)28i
1.8
Cup 260 1.8
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8
R 2.0
2.9
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9
1.8
2.0 TFSI
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
R 2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
R 2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.8
3.2i V6 24V
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
R 2.0
2.7
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (981)2.7
1.8
SLK 350 V6
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008SLK 350 V6
R 2.0
SLK 300
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300
Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8 vs KTM X-Bow R 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster