Car comparison

AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24VvsKTM X-Bow R 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TT Roadster (8J)

3.2i V6 24V

250 hp3189 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedRoadster2006-2010
VS

KTM X-Bow

R 2.0

240 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2007-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow R 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Lightest
    790 kg
    1,742 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    304 hp/t
    227 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    52/100
  • Best performance score
    64/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    632 km
    392 mi
  • Best practicality score
    30/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24VKTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
250hp186kW
240hp179kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
310Nm229lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
790kg1,742lb
Gross weight
1,810kg3,990lb
-
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
75.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
42.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
22.3s
Calculated
16.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
304hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
392Nm/t263lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
632km392mi
Calculated
513km319mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,189cc195cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,178mm164in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,842mm73in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,358mm53in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,468mm97in
2,430mm96in
Front track
1,572mm62in
1,672mm66in
Rear track
1,558mm61in
1,626mm64in
Trunk volume
250L
-
Doors
2
-
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
60L
40L
CO2 emissions
227g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24VKTM X-Bow R 2.0PowerTorque
  • AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow R 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V6,300 rpm2,500-3,000 rpm6,550 rpm
KTMX-BowR 2.06,500 rpm2,000 rpm7,200 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24VKTMX-BowR 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.3 s
16.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
102 mph
181 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW
KTMX-BowR 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V has 10 hp more than KTM X-Bow R 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow R 2.0 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
KTMX-BowR 2.0
310 Nm
229 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
KTMX-BowR 2.0
790 kg
1,742 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
250 km/h
155 mph
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V5.9 s
KTMX-BowR 2.03.9 s

Although AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V has more power, KTM X-Bow R 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow R 2.0 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 2.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
KTMX-BowR 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between KTM X-Bow R 2.0 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
KTMX-BowR 2.0
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
632 km
392 mi
KTMX-BowR 2.0
513 km
319 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW
5.9 s
250 km/h
155 mph
KTMX-BowR 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
250 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,178 mm
164.5 in
Height
1,358 mm
53.5 in
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow R 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
5.9 s
KTMX-BowR 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
KTMX-BowR 2.0
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24VKTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
3.9 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
790 kg
1,742 lb
Fuel consumption
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
250 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,178 mm
164.5 in
Height
1,358 mm
53.5 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
632 km
392 mi
513 km
319 mi
CO2 score
227 g/km
-
Trunk score
250 L
8.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24VKTM X-Bow R 2.0
Consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.63 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.76 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,494 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 119 km (74 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

KTM X-Bow R 2.0

  • Is 700 kg lighter
  • Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 136 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
KTM X-Bow R 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
R 2.0
1.8
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotus2-Eleven1.8
3.2i V6 24V
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
R 2.0
S Cup 1.8
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
R 2.0
28i
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsBMWZ4 (E89)28i
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
R 2.0
2.9
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
3.2i V6 24V
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI
3.2i V6 24V
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
R 2.0
Cup 260 1.8
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V vs KTM X-Bow R 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster