Images may not match the exact vehicle variant.

KTM X-Bow

R 2.0

Compare stock and tuned
240 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2007-2016
0-100 km/h 3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Performance

Performance
Power
240hp179kW
Torque
310Nm229lb-ft
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
Curb weight
790kg1,742lb
Power-to-weight
304hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
392Nm/t263lb-ft/ton
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
0-200 km/h
16.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.7s
Calculated
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
42.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated

Efficiency and range

Efficiency and range
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel tank
40L
Estimated range
513km319mi
Calculated

Engine and drivetrain

Engine and drivetrain
Body typeRoadster
Fuel typeGasoline
AspirationTurbocharged
Drive typeRWD
TransmissionManual
Gears6-speed
Engine layoutMiddle, Transverse
Engine configurationInline
Cylinders4
Valves per cylinder4

Dimensions and space

Dimensions and space
Length
3,738mm147in
Width
1,915mm75in
Height
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,430mm96in
Front track
1,672mm66in
Rear track
1,626mm64in
Seats
2

Performance spider chart

Current vehicle compared with the precomputed median score across the database.

Power benchmark

Current vehicle compared with the database median for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Power benchmark
VehicleValue
KTMX-BowR 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
Database median
262 hp
195 kW

0-100 km/h benchmark

Current vehicle compared with the database median for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · s

0-100 km/h benchmark
VehicleValue
KTMX-BowR 2.03.9 s
Database median6.4 s

Top speed benchmark

Current vehicle compared with the database median for Top speed. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Top speed benchmark
VehicleValue
KTMX-BowR 2.0
230 km/h
143 mph Unrestricted
220 km/h
137 mph Restricted
Database median
242 km/h
150 mph

Fuel consumption benchmark

Current vehicle compared with the database median for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Fuel consumption benchmark
VehicleValue
KTMX-BowR 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Database median
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKTM X-Bow R 2.0
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

KTM X-Bow R 2.0PowerTorque
  • KTM X-Bow R 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KTMX-BowR 2.06,500 rpm2,000 rpm7,200 rpm

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
KTM X-Bow R 2.0
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

R 2.0
1.8
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotus2-Eleven1.8
R 2.0
S Cup 1.8
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8
R 2.0
28i
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsBMWZ4 (E89)28i
R 2.0
2.9
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9
R 2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
R 2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
R 2.0
Cup 260 1.8
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8
R 2.0
2.7
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (981)2.7
R 2.0
SLK 300
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300
R 2.0
3.2i V6 24V
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
R 2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
R 2.0
1.8 i 16V 111R
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R
KTM X-Bow R 2.0 - FastVsFaster