KTM X-Bow
R 2.0 (Stage 3)
360 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2007-2016
Car comparison
KTM X-Bow R 2.0 · Stage 3vsKTM X-Bow R 2.0 · Stage 1vsKTM X-Bow R 2.0 · Stage 2vsKTM X-Bow R 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
KTM X-Bow
R 2.0 (Stage 1)
283 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2007-2016
VS
KTM X-Bow
R 2.0 (Stage 2)
312 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2007-2016
VS
KTM X-Bow
R 2.0
240 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2007-2016
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3) 360 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque481 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lightest790 kg1,742 lb
- Best power-to-weight456 hp/t340 kW/t2.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range513 km319 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score27/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW+120 hp | 283hp211kW+43 hp | 312hp233kW+72 hp | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 481Nm354lb-ft+171 Nm | 378Nm279lb-ft+68 Nm | 419Nm309lb-ft+109 Nm | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 790kg1,742lb | 790kg1,742lb | 790kg1,742lb | 790kg1,742lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 34.0s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph-8.6 s Calculated | 41.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-1.2 s Calculated | 37.1s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph-5.6 s Calculated | 42.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s-0.9 s | 3.5s-0.4 s | 3.3s-0.6 s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.2s-6.6 s Calculated | 12.8s-4.0 s Calculated | 12.0s-4.8 s Calculated | 16.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s-0.8 s Calculated | 3.4s-0.4 s Calculated | 3.2s-0.5 s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s-1.3 s Calculated | 11.6s-0.6 s Calculated | 11.3s-0.8 s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 456hp/t340kW/t207hp/1000 lb Calculated | 358hp/t267kW/t163hp/1000 lb Calculated | 395hp/t295kW/t179hp/1000 lb Calculated | 304hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 608Nm/t407lb-ft/ton Calculated | 479Nm/t320lb-ft/ton Calculated | 530Nm/t354lb-ft/ton Calculated | 392Nm/t263lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 513km319mi Calculated | 513km319mi Calculated | 513km319mi Calculated | 513km319mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,738mm147in | 3,738mm147in | 3,738mm147in | 3,738mm147in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,915mm75in | 1,915mm75in | 1,915mm75in |
| Height | 1,202mm47in | 1,202mm47in | 1,202mm47in | 1,202mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,430mm96in | 2,430mm96in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in | 1,672mm66in | 1,672mm66in | 1,672mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,626mm64in | 1,626mm64in | 1,626mm64in |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 40L | 40L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3) 360 hpKTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 1) 283 hpKTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 2) 312 hpKTM X-Bow R 2.0 240 hpPowerTorque
- KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3) 360 hp: Power / Torque
- KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 1) 283 hp: Power / Torque
- KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 2) 312 hp: Power / Torque
- KTM X-Bow R 2.0 240 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 6,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 6,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 6,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 6,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 3.4 s | 3.2 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 3.5 s | 3.3 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.2 s | 12.8 s | 12.0 s | 16.8 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 5.0 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 9.7 s | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 11.6 s | 11.3 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 128 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 360 hp 268 kW |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 283 hp 211 kW |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 312 hp 233 kW |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW |
KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3) 360 hp has 120 hp more than KTM X-Bow R 2.0 240 hp.
The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow R 2.0 240 hp and KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3) 360 hp: 120 hp (89 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 481 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 419 Nm 309 lb-ft |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 790 kg 1,742 lb |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 790 kg 1,742 lb |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 790 kg 1,742 lb |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 790 kg 1,742 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 3.0 s |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 3.5 s |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 3.3 s |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3) 360 hp and KTM X-Bow R 2.0 240 hp: 0.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 2) 312 hp and KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 1) 283 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 456 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 358 hp/t 267 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 395 hp/t 295 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 304 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 513 km 319 mi |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 513 km 319 mi |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 513 km 319 mi |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 513 km 319 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 360 hp 268 kW | 3.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 283 hp 211 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 312 hp 233 kW | 3.3 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3) 360 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 3.3 s |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | 456 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | 358 hp/t 267 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | 395 hp/t 295 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | 304 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 3)360 hp | KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 1)283 hp | KTMX-BowR 2.0 (Stage 2)312 hp | KTMX-BowR 2.0240 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 283 hp 211 kW | 312 hp 233 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 481 Nm 354 lb-ft | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft | 419 Nm 309 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 3.5 s | 3.3 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 790 kg 1,742 lb | 790 kg 1,742 lb | 790 kg 1,742 lb | 790 kg 1,742 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 513 km 319 mi | 513 km 319 mi | 513 km 319 mi | 513 km 319 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 456 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 358 hp/t 267 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 395 hp/t 295 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 304 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3) 360 hp | KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 1) 283 hp | KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 2) 312 hp | KTM X-Bow R 2.0 240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 3) 360 hp
- Has 77 hp more
- Has 102 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 97 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
KTM X-Bow R 2.0 (Stage 1) 283 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
KTM X-Bow R 2.0
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotus2-Eleven1.8
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsBMWZ4 (E89)28i
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (981)2.7
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R