Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lightest2,051 kg4,522 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t85 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions152 g/km
- Best estimated range1,224 km761 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,051kg4,522lb | 2,078kg4,581lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 97.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.7s Calculated | 43.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,183km735mi Calculated | 1,224km761mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,676mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,679mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 368L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | 152g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.7 s | 43.2 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has 10 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 1,183 km 735 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 1,224 km 761 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,183 km 735 mi | 1,224 km 761 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | 152 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 27 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 137 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 41 km (25 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























