Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5vsPorsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Macan I (95B)
S 3.0 Diesel V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lightest1,880 kg4,145 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions152 g/km
- Best estimated range1,224 km761 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,078kg4,581lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,575kg5,677lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 89.0s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.2s Calculated | 44.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 309Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,224km761mi Calculated | 952km592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,681mm184in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,679mm66in | 1,651mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 368L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
- Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 2,750-4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.2 s | 44.3 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 has 14 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 7.8 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 7.7 s |
Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 1,224 km 761 mi |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 952 km 592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.7 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,224 km 761 mi | 952 km 592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 | Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 272 km (169 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 198 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 132 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























